Using a cell-free translation system known as the PURE system, a team of researchers along with ELSI members have optimized a protein selection tool known as the mRNA/cDNA display method. This method, in general, enables a screening of over 1012 random protein sequences in a single experiment based on versatile function. To validate the presented method's performance, the team targeted a commercially available antibody that strongly binds to a specific peptide sequence known as FLAG. As a result, high-throughput sequencing data revealed an enriched known consensus FLAG sequence with additional unreported features. Hence, this approach will be helpful to explore the sequence and functional space of diverse polypeptides.

 

20210423_KFujishima1-3 

 

Figure 1. Cell-free mRNA/cDNA display. The system starts from a random DNA library. DNA library is in vitro transcribed to a mRNA library and then ligated to a puromycin-FITC DNA tag. The tagged product is then gel purified and translated using the PURE system. The resulting mRNA-peptide conjugate library is again gel purified. The product is used either directly for the target binding (mRNA display) or reverse-transcribed to make an mRNA/cDNA-peptide conjugate (cDNA display). After binding against the anti-FLAG antibody, the remaining binders are reverse transcribed and sequenced using high-throughput sequencing. One round of selection (excluding sequencing) completes in few days. (Graphical abstract adopted from Reyes et al., Biotechnol Bioeng, 118(4):1736-1749. (2021))

 

 

Cell-free transcription and translation systems have become an essential tool for in vitro protein expression mainly due to their flexibility in the reaction conditions and minimizing the limitations of working with actual living cells. The PURE system offers a contaminant-free solution by only using the purified components required for protein synthesis. The researchers have applied the PURE system to the mRNA display method and introduced two additional gel purification steps to maximize the products' purity. These improvements resulted in the improved formation of chemically conjugated mRNA (genotype) and its coding protein (phenotype). A cDNA display requires an additional step to mRNA display, making a complementary cDNA strand of the mRNA to prevent secondary structure formation and increase its stability. In general, these display methods can screen a vast number of protein molecules (up to 1013) in a single experiment. They targeted commercially available anti-FLAG antibodies for evaluating the newly refined display method's performance due to the nature of its known short consensus binding motif (DYKXXD). Starting from approximately 1.7 x 10^12 random peptide sequences, the team performed a total of four selection rounds for mRNA and cDNA display (Figure 1).

 

 

20210423_KFujishima2-3 

 

Figure 2. A consensus of top 50 most abundant sequences. Sequence logos represent the round-by-round abundance of amino acids at each position in the total 10aa-random library (left). FLAG consensus motif (DYKxxD) appeared at two distinct locations within the 10aa-random library (right). Amino acid residues are color-coded based on their charge properties (negatively charged: red, positively charged: blue, and others: black). (Figure adopted from Reyes et al., Biotechnol Bioeng, 118(4):1736-1749. (2021))

 

 

 

A round-by-round high-throughput sequencing revealed clear enrichment of the FLAG epitope consensus motif DYK(D/L/N)(L/Y/D/N/F)D for both display methods, which required minimum three rounds of selection for the motifs to become prominent (Figure 2). Overall, both display methods resulted in similar performance with slightly higher enrichment for mRNA display (Figure 3).

 

 

20210423_KFujishima3-3 

Figure 3. Round-by-round enrichment profile of identified FLAG epitope consensus motif. Bar graph represents reads per million (RPM) data obtained from the initial library (0th) to 4th round for the FLAG epitope consensus motif DYK(D/L/N)(D/F/L/N/Y)D found at two different positions. In the 4th round, the researchers performed sequencing after stepwise competitive elution with FLAG-peptide at 4, 20, 100 μg/ml concentration and also sequenced the products that remained on the anti-FLAG antibody beads. The two methods are colored as white (mRNA display) and black (cDNA display). *RPM is a normalized value for sequence read count obtained for each unique peptide sequence in order to compare the data among various rounds of selection. (Figure adopted from Reyes et al., Biotechnol Bioeng, 118(4):1736-1749. (2021))

 

 

 

Whereas, a control experiment eliminating the gel purification step resulted in poor conjugate product formation and led to an increase of sequences with incorrect lengths. It indicates that conjugate purity contributes to the rapid enrichment of correct binding sequences. Under such messy conditions, the cDNA display has an advantage over the mRNA display, minimizing the non-specific interaction by masking the mRNA region with cDNA. The newly refined in vitro selection tool will allow researchers to explore diverse protein sequence space towards understanding primitive protein functions relevant to the origin of life study as well as developing de novo protein aptamers for future biomolecular tools and peptide drug developments.

 

 

Journal  Biotechnology and Bioengineering 
Tile of the paper  PURE mRNA display and cDNA display provide rapid detection of core epitope motif via high‐throughput sequencing 
Authors  Sabrina Galiñanes Reyes1,2,3, Yutetsu Kuruma1,2,4,  Mai Fujimi1, Masako Yamazaki5, Sumie Eto1,5, Shota Nishikawa1,6, Satoshi Tamaki5, Asaki Kobayashi7, Ryo Mizuuchi4,8, Lynn Rothschild9, Mark Ditzler9, Kosuke Fujishima1,10,* 
Affiliations 

1EarthLife Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguroku, Tokyo, Japan

2Extracuttingedge Science and Technology Avantgarde Research Program, Japan Agency for MarineEarth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan

3James Watt School of Engineering, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

4JST, PRESTO, Saitama, Japan

5MOLCURE Inc., Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan

6School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan

7SABNP, Univ Evry, INSERM U1204, Université ParisSaclay, Evry, France

8Komaba Institute for Science, The University of Tokyo, Meguroku, Tokyo, Japan

9Center for the Emergence of Life, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA

10Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa, Japan 
DOI  10.1002/bit.27696 
Online published date  27 January, 2021